At its most basic, you tell me what your program is and provide the background information. I write it up. You read it. I make adjustments based on your feedback. We submit it.

 

But, of course, it's never that simple.

 

You have to be up-to-date on what's happening in the field, so I do a lot of research. I look for model programs and evidence-based programs and best practices. I summarize that information. I ask you a million questions. We talk and brainstorm.

 

Your partners need to know what they're getting into and that understanding must be reflected in your agreements and letters of commitment. Otherwise, funders know you'll have problems when you implement. I can provide an overview of the application for you to share with your partners and supporters and a template for the letters and Memoranda of Understanding.

Your grant applications must translate your agency's story into a story that is meaningful to the funder, so I take the proposal evaluator's perspective throughout the process. That's why my questions can seem pushy. I think like a funder.

This is the perspective I bring you whether I'm writing the grant or editing your work.

I want your application to stand out from the crowd. I want the evaluator reading it at 11pm, with fifteen more applications to go, to say, "Phew, what a relief to read something clear, concise, interesting, and useful."